Unraveling Digital Identity: A Deep Dive into Document Formation and Its Implications
You Tube: https://youtu.be/zE0iOT62cKc
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/c1XwGpfI97gb/
Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/dashboard/videos/8f50b39a-2cbe-42e8-a541-0027ef6d9d3c
Oddysey: https://odysee.com/@adrianr:8/ep.292-sui-generis-your-digital-id-is:c
Rumble: https://rumble.com/v3rctvm-your-digital-id-is-based-on-presumption-not-your-biological-reality-sui-gen.html
Join us as we engage in an enlightening conversation on the intricacies of digital identity and document formation. In this episode, Adrian and Sui Generis discuss the underlying mechanisms, historical context, and the analytical approach needed to understand the evolving landscape of digital IDs.
Key Points with Timestamps:
0:02 – Introduction Adrian welcomes Sui Generis and sets the stage for a discussion on digital identities and document formation.
0:20 – The Overarching Topic: Digital ID Sui Generis elaborates on the significance of digital IDs and the need for an analytical approach.
1:22 – The Spin of Digital IDs: Discussion on how digital IDs are often presented with a sense of inevitability and how critical thinking can unravel these notions.
3:10 – Creating the Narrative: Sui Generis speaks about the intentional creation of narratives around digital IDs and the role of influencers in perpetuating these ideas.
6:14 – Document Exploration: Conversation about digging into documents and the realization of how digital and tangible IDs overlap yet serve various purposes.
9:08 – Rebutting Presumptions: A deep dive into how presumptions about digital IDs can be rebutted with evidence and analytical thinking.
12:21 – Behavior Manipulation: Discussion on how narratives around digital IDs are crafted to elicit certain behaviors from individuals.
16:02 – The Impact of Legal Personality: Examining the formation of legal personalities and the reality of documentation in these processes.
20:38 – The Role of the Church: Sui Generis introduces the significant yet often overlooked role of the church in document formation and registration.
24:03 – Challenging Authority: Debate on how questioning authority and its decisions can unravel hidden mechanisms behind digital and legal identities.
30:04 – Light-hearted Approach: Adrian and Sui Generis discuss the benefits of maintaining a playful yet critical mindset when dealing with complex systems.
38:03 – Hollywood vs. Reality: Contrast between Hollywood’s depiction of societal breakdowns and actual human behavior during crises.
41:03 – Back to Basics: Recap of key points and the importance of staying grounded in reality while navigating complex narratives.
45:20 – The Importance of Terminology: Insight into how specific terminologies used in official documents have deeper implications.
50:25 – Symbolic Rituals and Legal Effects: Examples of how symbolic events, like baptisms, have real legal outcomes and the necessity of understanding these processes.
58:17 – Corresponding with Authorities: Adrian and Sui Generis review their attempts at eliciting transparent responses from officials and the mixed results they’ve encountered.
1:09:00 – Conclusion: Final thoughts on the digital ID discussion and a hint at future episodes.
It might serve you well to have watched Episode 291 before this episode to get a broader foundation of knowledge. If you want to you can find it here:
A comment placed 21 July 2023 on the YouTube video for this podcast:
@Day.Of.The.GroundBreaker
1: Who are you?
2: When were you?
3: Where were you?
4: What are you?
1: = name with inheritance /or CORPORATION (ens–legis)
2: = date of birth /or registration date
3: = born on the land in house /or on a citizenship in a ward
4: = living flesh and blood male, female /or according to the Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition pages 665 & 666
If nothing in their government records has the real you named with the proper grammar — then how is it different than a dead person’s estate or the mark of the beast or a business registered in the department of commerce?
The truth is they committed SHANGHAI.
“To drug, intoxicate, or render insensible and ship as a sailor, — usually to secure advance money or a premium. Webster, Dict.
Under federal law, procuring or inducing, or attempting to do so,
by force, or threats, or by representations which one knows or believes to be untrue,
or while the person is intoxicated or under the influence of any drug, to go on board of any vessel,
or agree to do so, to perform service or labor thereon, such vessel being engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, on the high seas or any navigable water of the United States, or knowingly
to detain on board such vessel such person, so procured or induced, or knowingly aiding or abetting such things, is an offense.” 18 U.S.C 2194 – Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition
Key words: To take advantage of a mother in ‘labor’ while she is under the medical administration of drugs in a ward and then trick her into signing her baby away as a product, even as far much in the simple wording of ‘delivery’ should make people raise eyebrows. Slavery was never abolished — they just made it subtle by contracts.
UCC § 2-105. Definitions: Transferability; “Goods”; “Future” Goods; “Lot”; “Commercial Unit”.
Primary tabs
(1) “Goods” means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (Article 8) and things in action. “Goods” also includes the unborn young of animals and growing crops and other identified things attached to realty as described in the section on goods to be severed from realty (Section 2-107).
etymoline . com/word/identity
identity (n.)
c. 1600, “sameness, oneness, state of being the same,” from French identité (14c.), from Medieval Latin identitatem (nominative identitas) “sameness,” ultimately from Latin idem (neuter) “the same” (see idem). [For discussion of Latin formation, see entry in OED.] Earlier form of the word in English was idemptitie (1560s), from Medieval Latin idemptitas. Term identity crisis first recorded 1954. Identity theft attested from 1995. Identity politics is attested by 1987.
7 U.S. Code § 136 – Definitions
(d) Animal
The term “animal” means all vertebrate and invertebrate species, including but not limited to man and other mammals, birds, fish, and shellfish.
By the time it takes the eager man or woman to find this information (took me 33 years) — and they’ve found it, most won’t listen and the contracts that got us entangled are so hard to jump-off from, that most give up and go back onto the plantation.