Taking YouTube training about Covid-19 to get a warning removed from the channel
This morning i was greeted by a message from YouTube stating I should take a training program to keep others safe, and noting it was the only way to get the warning removed from my channel.
I found the information, questions, and process a fascinating attempt to revise my thought process. What is very clear is that anything that contradicts the narrative of the World Health Organisation with regard to health is considered dangerous and not factual. Even when there are scientific studies to the contrary. I wonder how a non-elected organization that clearly knows nothing of health gets to decide how you and I conduct our lives.
In case you are interested I have screenshots of the questions and the answers, the correct answer gives a short description of why the answer is correct.

Misinformation. Who defines what misinformation is? How is it defined? Can a corporation actually do anything at all or have an opinion? Is it not a dead fictional entity? It is the people, ordinary men and women like you and me, that are the ones doing the stuff that they say is the corporation? Are their “claims” of misinformation accurate or just baseless claims to suit their agenda? Could they be used to sway opinion for profit and control?

So, is it best to not take any vitamins and minerals then since they obviously are of no relevance at all, ignoring once more that they are still beating the COVID drum.

So, as long as you acknowledge that the government can always and should be trusted, it is up to someone else to fix things. But it appears most importantly that you allow yourself to be gaslighted into be-LIE-ving in the existence of something that does not exist.

Shame on you for wanting to show that the injections of poisons into your body can cause harm. Keep that stuff to yourself since it goes against the narrative. I don’t buy the second part of their statement starting “while we may”. You can see big pharma’s hooks in this response.

No comment to make on this stupid example. Other than the mantra that you must not contradict the world health organization, that perhaps we should replace health with death and suffering…



So medical science-based (if indeed there is any real science being done in the public realm, but I digress) study is not allowed or considered relevant since it contravenes the WHO’s opinion (see my comments above about dead things).
Well, at least I got the questions right and am fully indoctrinated/re-programmed back into their system. Not.
