More government lies and shenanigans
A valued subscriber sent this email to me:
Thank you for all of your videos and please keep making them. This is for your information. A friend and I uncovered this last night on the gov.uk website and were horrified. Please use it as you see fit.
It would appear they are not being truth full or transparent (surprise surprise). Another document we uncovered was this – look at the date in the URL then look at the date it was supposedly ‘heard’.
There is a petition to stop any restrictions for those not wanting to take a vaccine:
It clearly states in the first two documents that the producers (i.e. pharmaceutical companies) will not be held liable for vaccine injury, harm, damage or death. The government payout is a maximum of £120,000 per case and is rarely adhered to unless explicit evidence is produced to prove a link between the given vaccine and subsequent injury, harm, damage or death. The evidence makes you jump through hoops and you have to be aware at the time that you need the batch number, full pharmacological name of the vaccine being given, the name of the person administering it, dates, places, times etc etc even the syringe size.
Which takes me to the point in the documents of the use of non-healthcare professionals and routine enforcement. The use of non-professionals to administer any vaccine. This is just downright dangerous and takes the liability even further from big pharma and it looks as though it will be done on a slaughter house model – line up, go through the process, come out modified. I am a qualified psychiatric nurse (no longer registered as I became so utterly dismayed at what I was being asked to do, so I took myself off the register in my own good conscience and honour) and this horrifies me. I would never put my duty of care to my clients/patients into the hands of someone who has not had full training in giving of injections and subsequent possible remedial actions they may need to take, whether intramuscular, subcutaneous or otherwise. With contra-indications, severe side effects (which bear in mind they will not have had training in because there has not been enough testing to know what those severe side effects may be) and possible anaphylaxis. The next question would be are health professionals going to be used to administer these vaccines? Or are they going to enable it like the mask wearing to make healthcare assistants, nursing assistants etc feel virtuous that they are ‘doing the right thing’ and it is for ‘the greater good’? The muzzle wearing has made people with no medical background, physically or mentally, believe that they have the authority/right (read; author-ity/rite) to question, shame, harass, beleaguer, embarrass others.
This next document clearly states, among other things, that the infection of Covid 19 naturally clears; on page 2 Professor Robin Shattock. (By the way Dr Winston lost my vote and respect when he stated in a select committee that myalgic encephalomyelitis was a psychiatric disease!!!! Contrary to what science had found around the world by the time he made his speech. He’s a poster boy like most of them and wanted it to be included in the DSM V which is written by the American Psychiatrists – mmmmm let me think, how many pharmaceuticals and psychotropics can you get people to take indefinitely when you classify a disease as psychiatric???
This next one is the consultation document which does not appear to be for individuals, but appears that individuals can consult on it. I have not gone through the whole process yet, but it may be of interest and is only open until the 18th of September for anyone who wants to go through the process:
Hope you are enjoying your break and sorry to interrupt it, but I thought you may find this interesting at the least.
In peace, love, light and harmony