YouTube: https://youtu.be/hxpFTMeZ4Bc
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/MrOwI7DLPvPl/
Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/1cf7c165-6a0d-4759-abe6-54bbbc3a3c50
Oddysey: https://odysee.com/@adrianr:8/ep.261-as-man-or-woman-you-are-not-a:b

In 1666 some things were changed to capture all souls and transfer ownership of assets and property to the state (London). I have taken time to enlighten myself and learn how language is used to control us and steal from us from the cradle to the grave.

This podcast is me reading a comment left on one of my other videos and is from a man called : peter. I have added some comments for clarification. The pdf of the transcript is here:

A few days later Peter pointed to the sign language I incorrectly used in the title.

Peter Thompson

Hi Adrian,

When you think deeper, even with this podcast you can literally see. hear, and then read more into it, just think for a moment? The “title,” yes the title to this podcast “As a man or woman you are NOT a person,” Well, as you would know the all-caps letter is saying “nothing,” as it does not conform to correct English grammar, so I wouldn`t read it, so, what am I seeing and reading? (Sometimes it is best to point the question mark it empathises its a question, I am asking and making you think), so let us look at the title to someone who can read English, and recognises a different language. So, for someone who reads in English, what would they see and read? It would not be ” As a man or woman you are NOT a person,” in truth and reality, it would be. “As a man or woman, you are a person,” I would not read the “NOT” as that is in “sign language,” but most if not all the people, wouldn`t see it, and I naturally added a “,” Commas are one of the most frequently used punctuation marks in the English language – they`re also one of the most misused. Commas signify a pause between different parts of a sentence, making the meaning clearer and the writer easier to read. So, I could say what is he really saying, if I was reading this out and had it on a screen behind me at a meeting, of fifty people, unless someone pointed it out because they thought, I had misspoken, and being pedantic interrupted and maybe some even to the point of being annoyed, and even to the point of an argument erupted, because they are there to hear me speak. I restore the peace and thank that man or woman, for pointing this out, as I was hoping someone would, why? I was there to talk about “Sign language,” how easily we can be tricked and deceived. It not being pedantic to point out to fully understand what someone is actually saying because it is confusing if you believe that he misspoke when in truth I never did, I was hoping someone would point it out, if they didn`t I would have to do so, to explain “sign language,” the very reason I was there, the “Topic” I wanted them to understand and not for them to be deceived by this/their trickery.

Once you understand English and the grammar, or should I say the glaring error and why it is true, that all capitalise lettering is saying nothing unless you give it life by reading sign language and they did not know it, wouldn`t it make people start to think? If you add or remove one letter or a word in a sentence you can see how it changes what it is saying, you can see how people see and interpret things differently. I was going to get a coffee and a sandwich with a homeless guy, and he said that`s a good shop for clothing, I look at the “sign,” above the shop and said it was called, when pointing it out when I said which one “le-gends” legends. I said on the way back, look what a silly name for a shop “Leg-ends” he tried to correct me, but he could only see “Leg-ends” and not “Legends,” you see how we can misinterpret “Signs,” when you do not understand the language, he told me every time he walks past that shop all he sees now is “Leg-ends,” this is how the use of language is used against us, as we can see and read in different ways. Like I said about old Latin, they call it classical Latin the “elite” uses, whereas Vulgar Latin is the language of the “commoner,” the five romances languages (Italian, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Romania) all derive from that common Vulgar Latin, and I would add English to that five as been spread around the world. But ask yourself do the “Elite” use it, as I said before are Classical Latin and Vulgar Latin, as different from English and Legalese? makes you think does it? Just like that imaginary fifty people, were you expecting someone to point out the error in the “title,” of this podcast? I thought I would wait, to see if someone did do that and point out that glaring error, but alas no one did, did they? You see how the so-called authorises, send how paperwork/documents and people see a different thing, by seeing and reading different things into them and giving them life to exist, and that is called “consent,” you cannot say you did not know, or you would have asked question of them for clarity.

So, when people receive a summons they do not know it is “addressing,” the legal fiction of a corporate person that the government created. Then in that document, there are various boxes, What does something in a box mean? According to “the four corner rule” it only applies to what is in that box, what is outside, must be outside for a reason? They hope you do not ask them questions like most don`t, they just don`t “think,” and not thinking is, is not being “proactive”.

Part two, of “AS a man or woman you are NOT a person,” as your title says. I would see and read it as “As a man or woman, you are a person” or if I translate your sign language into English ” As a man or woman you are not a person.

P.S. Vulgar Latin is the commoner, when people say you are vulgar, what do you think they saying by that word? is it? Vulgar (adj.) 1, lacking sophistication or good taste. 2, making explicit and offence references to sex or bodily function, coarse and rude. Vulgar (adj.) late 14c., “common, ordinary,” from Latin Vulgariss, volgaris “of or pertaining to the common people, common, vulgar, low, mean” from vulgus “the common people, multitude, crowd, throng” perhaps from PIE root *wel- “to crowd, throng”( source also of Sanskrit vargah “division, group.” Greek eilein “to press, throng,” Middle Breton gwal`ch “abundance,” Welsh gwala “sufficiency, enough). The meaning “coarse, low, ill-bred” is first recorded the 1640s, probably from earlier use, with reference to people with the meaning “belonging to the ordinary class” (1530).

So, when they say “Common Law, does it only apply to “Commoner” and not the “Elite? Classical Latin (elite) is known as Legalese, and Vulgar Latin (commoner) is English, in today’s world of the “Elite”? This why I do not use “Common Law,” common to who, just the Vulgar Latin/romances/ English Languages, and not the people who use Classical Latin/legalese around the world, makes you think doesn`t it?