Ep.134 | Is the coronavirus test a likely candidate for direct brain access?
YouTube:
Bitchute:
Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/f7b7e453-edc5-459b-9908-610870d9e841
Lbry.tv: https://open.lbry.com/@adrianr:8/ep-134-is-the-coronavirus-test-a-likely:d?r=F2y2tkFVYf6fh1r9c2P62qysekfoE7rj
From the moment i saw the very long and invasive testing procedure (that may not be the same in all testing locations) I felt there was something very wrong.
Off Guardian Article:
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
Here is what I feel to be a very plausible article.
Original blog post:
http://82.221.129.208/.vh9.html
In this article you can read that in some studies saliva swabs were the most appropriate and offers a non-invasive suitable alternative. So why the physical distress and potential for damage and possible brain access?
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/latest-evidence/diagnostic-testing
As always please do your own research, thinking and draw your own conclusions.
