YouTube: https://youtu.be/SZOJpNWJTJM
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/VU0y3FztUar9/
Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/a38f3477-4354-4aca-85c7-fc69a5281917
Lbry.tv: https://lbry.tv/@adrianr:8/2020-virus-94-ep-90-a-subscribers:a

A very well thought out and well reasoned common sense approach to how things are working in the body.

Hi Adrian,

I go to sleep thinking on things and see what has developed when I wake up. I usually try to think logically about what our body’s system would be doing and how it works with everything I’ve learned… and possibly how things can be so misconstrued by the general medical profession. And here is a summary of what I woke up thinking this morning:

So, our body ingests a toxin or is infected with an unpleasant bacteria of some sort, which then attacks and destroys tissue . As cells within the tissue die, they release exosomes (almost like a sinking ship sending out an SOS signal). These exosomes can attach to other cells, whereby they are readily absorbed, replicated, and then released into the blood stream to further alert other cells all around our body to the threat, and indeed initiate the generation of more white blood cells.

White blood cells are generated to deal with the threat head on, and bacteria within us clean up the dead cells and decaying tissue. I’m thinking that as well as being the SOS signal, the exosomes (as Tom Barnett suggested), could also act as garbage collectors to the toxic waste excreted by the bacteria as a result of them feeding on the toxic dead cells/tissue. Like he says, the remaining toxins can not harm an exosome if it is not alive.

Then I struggled with antibodies… what exactly is an antibody?… and where do they fit in?

Well a new thought has occurred to me. The antibodies are the things that target the exosomes to neutralise them once our body has the disease under control, otherwise the exosomes would simply carry on relpicateing unchecked. This way, antibodies will always be associated with exosomes, and indeed can easily be misconstrued as the entities seen to be attacking a virus. So to my mind, the generally accepted science has actually got this bit right… but for all the wrong reasons.

The fact that at some point our body’s are flooded with exosomes doing their work, means that we can easily transmit them (through all the generally accepted methods), whereby they are naturally absorbed by another person’s cells and trigger the same disease alert response in that other person – just like a fire alarm going off in a building alerting the people inside to a possible threat. If no disease is found in that other person, then nothing or very little happens – false alarm, we all go back into the building. However, if that person has a multitude of health problems, and is riddled with disease (or even the toxicity of drugs), then the resulting detoxification can be fatal.

Basically our bodies will work hard to rid us of disease… or kill us trying! It’s all just nature doing its thing.

So, in effect, when we are vaccinated against a virus, then YES, our body will indeed generate antibodies in response to the virus/exosome (or part thereof) that has just been injected into us. But realistically, in a healthy body, all these newly generated antibodies are doing is reacting to rid the body of these unnecessary exosomes that have triggered a false state of alarm. These antibodies have not reacted to any actual disease as such, and are just doing what they would do under a true disease condition. But, the antibodies are NOT the entities that fight or rid us of disease anyway, that is left to our white blood cells and bacteria.

So a vaccine actually does nothing that our body would not do under a true disease threat… other that is, than add potentially harmful, unnatural substances into our blood streams that may (and do) create problems /disease of their own.

For me at least, it’s like many of the pieces of the puzzle are starting to fall into place now. A better bigger picture is emerging.

---

27/5/20

Here’s a really radical thought: A virus/exosome is just a string of DNA or RNA in a protective protein casing. It is not actually a living thing… so how can it possibly have an agenda?

The more I think about this, the less the general medical model of a virus makes any sense… in fact it makes absolutely no sense at all. Given that a virus/exosome only comes into existence by being produced by a living cell in the first place, to me at least, it makes far more sense that a virus/exosome is primarily just a messenger (an information carrier).

I’m now thinking that a virus/exosome is simply a packet of information that is readily absorbed by a cell (a bit like a letter coming through your letterbox). This package contains important threat information, so your cell replicates it and ‘reposts’ it in order to alert other cells and trigger a defensive action/detoxification.

As for the spread of infection – or rather how this information spreads – then a good analogy might be that of a postman delivering no specific letter for any particular household, but rather a circular that goes through every letterbox.

Of course, once again, all this would mean that vaccines are at best targeting completely the wrong thing… and at worst actually devastating to the body’s natural balance.

So, I say again: HOW CAN A NON-LIVING VIRUS POSSIBLY HAVE AN AGENDA?

---

As always please do your own research, thinking and draw your own conclusions.